SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Gau) 21

B.N.SARMA
Sasa Musa Sugar Works Pvt. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Chunilal Chororia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Choudhuri and B.K. Acharyya, S.K. Senapati

Judgement

This Rule has been obtained by the defendant against the order made by the Assistant District Judge, Cachar, in Money Suit No. 23/72, by which he has decided a preliminary objection raised in the suit, namely, whether his Court has got the jurisdicdiction to try the suit, in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff-opposite party filed the suit for a decree of Rs. 22,500/- against the defendant petitioner as damages for breach of a contract for sale of 750 bags of sugar inclusive of an amount of Rs. 7,500/- paid as advance. The plaintiff alleged in the plaint that the sugar was to be delivered to the plaintiff at Silchar and so the cause of action in the suit arose at Silchar.

2. The defendant by filing a verified petition raised a preliminary objection as to the jurisdiction of the Court at Silchar. It was alleged in the petition that in terms of clause 3 (b) of the contract all suits arising out of any dispute in respect of the transaction covered by the contract would be subject to the jurisdiction only in the District Court at Saran (Bihar) and as such the Court at Silchar has got no jurisdiction to try the suit. The defendants filed the copies of three sale contracts co








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top