BAHARUL ISLAM
Kanthi Ram Bora – Appellant
Versus
Dom Bora (Deceased) () and his heirs and legal representatives. Mt. Dhupali Bora and others – Respondent
This is an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act and is directed against the order dated 11-1-1972 passed by the District Judge, U. A. D. Jorhat in Title Suit (Probate) No. 26 of 1969, in which he held that the appellant was not entitled to any probate of the will.
2. The appellants case is that one Kolai executed a will in his favour. The will was written by Gobinda Chandra Mahanta, P. W. 2, and attested by two witnesses both of whom were dead. The appellant further stated that the property mentioned in the will was given to him and one Puhita, wife of the testator. The testator died on 8-11-1952 leaving the two legatees and one Dom Bora, a non-applicant. Puhita also died in 1963 leaving no heir. In such circumstances the appellant applied for probate of the will. Before the institution of the present probate case the appellant had filed another probate case (Misc. Case No. 39/60) in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Jorhat, but that case was dismissed for not depositing the necessary court-fee.
3. Notice of the present probate case was issued to the heirs of Dom Bora and one Haren Sarma who had purchased from Smt. Puhita her share of the land. Haren Sarm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.