SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Gau) 12

BAHARUL ISLAM, D.PATHAK
Chandra Kanta Medhi and others – Appellant
Versus
Lakheswar Nath and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Sarma, K.P. Sen

Judgement

BAHARUL ISLAM, J.:- This is an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent from the judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court and arises out of a probate case.

2. Lakheswar Nath, respondent No. 1 herein, filed an application under Section 270 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter called the Act), before the District Judge, Dhubri, for the probate of a will alleged to have been executed by one Purnima Bala Devi, who died on 21-7-69. In the application he mentioned the names of appellants 1, 2 and 3 and respondents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and one Jikafuli Devi as the relatives left by the deceased Purnima Bala Devi. In the application he mentioned that he had been appointed by the testarix the executor of the will.

3. The appellants filed objections. Their material objections were to the effect that at the relevant time the executrix "had no testamentary and mental capacity, she had no disposing mind, she had no mental power requisite for a valid disposition of property, she was in extreme suffering due to serious illness and extreme old age". It was averred that the will was the result of collusion and fraud perpetrated by the applicant and the legatee, Haranath. It w
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top