GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Baharul Islam, J.
Jiauddin Ahmed -Appellant
Versus
Anwara Begum -Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 199 of 1977
Decided On : 31-03-1978
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - SECTION 125 - MAINTENANCE - MUSLIM LAW - TALAK - VALIDITY - CONDITIONS PRECEDENT - RECONCILIATION ATTEMPTS - REASONABLE CAUSE - INTERPRETATION OF QURANIC VERSES - MODERN TREND - ESSENTIAL CONDITION PRECEDENT.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a senior executive of an oil refinery, sought to revise a magistrate's order granting maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The wife alleged cruelty and neglect, while the petitioner claimed he had divorced her through talaq and paid all dues as per Muslim law.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner failed to prove a valid talaq under Muslim law. It held that talaq must be for a reasonable cause and preceded by attempts at reconciliation between the spouses by two arbiters, one from each family. The court also noted the modern trend of restricting the husband's unilateral power to divorce.
Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner had validly divorced his wife through talaq under Muslim law. 2. Whether the wife was entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted relevant verses of the Quran and commentaries by scholars to establish that talaq must be for a reasonable cause and preceded by attempts at reconciliation. It rejected the view that the husband has arbitrary power to divorce his wife. 2. Since the petitioner failed to prove a valid talaq, the court held that the wife was entitled to maintenance under Section 125.
Final Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's application to revise the magistrate's order granting maintenance to his wife.
This is an application in revision made by the petitioner, who is (he husband, against the order passed by a first class Magistrate at Tinsukia in favour of the opposite party, Mrs. Anwara Begum, granting her maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973 (hereinafter called 'the Code').
2. The material facts may be briefly stated thus:
The petitioner is a Senior Executive of the A.O.C. Refinery at Digboi. Mrs. Anwara Begum was married to him at Margherita in the year 1973. Both the pi sties are Musal-mans and governed by Muslim Personal Law.
The opposite party in her petition under Section 125 of the Code alleged that she lived with her husband for about 9 months during which time the marriage had been consumated. Thereafter the petitioner began to torture her and even used to beat her. Ultimately the petitioner drove her away whereupon she has been living with her father, who is a day labourer. She has alleged that the petitioner draws a salary of Rs. 3,500/- per month but inspite of that he has been neglecting her. So she prayed for grant of maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month.
3. The petitioner filed a written statement. He admitted the marriage. He has alleged that there was incompatibility in the temperament between him and the wife. He has denied that he treated hit wife with cruelty. He has alleged that the wife was allowed to go to her parents' house with the hops that she might change, but as she did not change, he bad no alternative but to divorce her by pronouncing 'Talak' on 10.10.76 and the same was registered at Kazi's office on 12.10.76 at Dibrugarh. He has further averred that the wife was paid all sums payable under the Mahamedan Law on the day of divorce''.
4. Before the Magistrate the wife examined herself and P.W. 2, the Head clerk of the Accounts Department, A.O.C. at Digboi, to prove the petitioner's income, and P.Ws 3 and 4 to prove cruelty. The petitioner did not examine himself but examined one Murtaza as his witness to prove registration of the talaq.
5. The learned Magistrate, on a consideration of the materials before him, has, arrived at the following foldings of fact : (i) that the husband has sufficient means to maintain his wife; (ii) that he has neglected to maintain her; (iii) that the wife is unable to maintain herself; (iv) that the 'wife' has not re-married; with the result he has passed the impugned order granting maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 300/- per month as stated earlier. Relying on 36 C.W.N. 305, he held that the petitioner orally pronounced talak in the absence of the wife and it was a valid divorce but he granted maintenance as the definition of 'wife' in Clause (b) of the Explanation to Section 125(1) of the Code 'includes a woman divorced by her husband and has not remarried".
6. The first point that falls for consideration is whether there has been a valid talaq of the wife by the petitioner under the Muslim Law. 'Talaq' is an Arabic word meaning divorce. It carries the literal significance of 'freeing' or 'the undoing of a knot'. Talaq means divorce of a woman by her husband. Before the advent of Prophet Muhammad the condition of women in the world particularly in Arabia, was very miserable. For all practical purposes worn en were the properties or chattel, as it were, of men. A man could marry any number of wives and could divorce any of them at any time at his whims or caprice. Islam realised that for peace and happiness of a family and for protection and beneficial upbringing of children, divorce was undesirable. The Holy Quran put strong restrictions on the divorce of women by their husbands.
Though marriage under the Muslim Law is only a civil contract, yet the rights and responsibilities consequent upon it are of such importance to the welfare of humanity, that a high degree of sanctity is attached to it. But inspite of the sacredness of the character of the marria
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.