SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Gau) 32

BAHARUL ISLAM, D.PATHAK
Must. Rukia Khatun – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Khalique Laskar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.Mazumdar, M.A.Laskar, S.A.Laskar

Islam, C.J.:-

This is an application under Section 401 of the Cede of Criminal Procedure and is directed against an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hailakandi, ejecting an application for maintenance filed by the petitioner (wife) under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter 'the new Code'). The material facts are these :

2. The petitioner's case is that she was married by the opposite party (husband) about 3 (three) years ago. They lived as husband and wife for about three months whereafter the husband abandoned and neglected her. She was not provided with any maintenance and was passing her days in penury. She prayed for maintenance of Rs. 150/- per month from the husband.

3. The opposite party filed a written statement and con­tested the petitioner's application. He admitted the marriage, but his plea was that he divorced the petitioner on 12.4.1972 by executing a talaqnama. He further pleaded that he paid the dower money to the petitioner.

4. The Magistrate found that petitioner had been divo­rced by the opposite party. He held that as the petitioner had been divorced before the coming into operation of the new Code, she was not entitl











































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top