SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Gau) 9

D.PATHAK, K.LAHIRI
Tarun Kumar Das, Bimal Kumar Gogoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.Das, C.R.De, D.N.Choudhury, N.N.Saikia, J.M.Choudhury, P.C.Kataky, P.Deka, P.K.Baruah

Lahiri, J.:-

On 13. 1. 81, we allowed the Habeas Corpus application of Shri Tarun kumar Das, a detenu in misc. Case No. 8(HC) of 1981, ordered his release and observed that a reasoned judgment would follow. We were told at the Bar, during the course of hearing, that another application having "the common question of law" was pending for disposal. So, we deferred delivery of the judgment. The case namely, Civil Rule No. 54(HC) of 1981 (Criminal Misc. case No. 28(HC) of 1981) has come up today. We have heard the parties and find that the case involved the same question of law. Ergo, our reasoned judgment. In the process, we propose to dispose of Civil Rule No. 54 of 198].

2. A thumb-nail facts of Tarun's case-Tarun was arrested and detained on the strength of an order issued by the State Government under Section 3(1)(a) of ''the National Security Ordinance II of 1980"-for short "the Ordinance". The Ordinance was promulgated by the President on the 22nd September, 1980, to provide for preventive detention in certain cases and for matters connected therewith. It came into force on the 23rd day of September, 1980. In exercise of its power u/s 9 of the Ordinance, the State Government, by N








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top