The above Civil Rules arise out of common orders which are challenged in two petitions by separate peti­tioners. This order will govern both Civil Rules so far as the stay orders passed by this Court are concerned.

2. The petitioners in Civil Rule 388 of 1981 obtained ad-interim stay order against the respondents. The order runs as:-

"Heard Mr. P.K. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitoner.

Let the records be called for. Let a Rule issue calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a writ should not issue as prayed for; or why such further or other order should not be passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Sr. Govt. Advocate for the State of Assam in regard to the stay. Stay the operation of impugned order, Annexure 'B' and 'F' to the petition until further orders."

3. It appears that annexure 'E' to the petition the opera­tion of which was stayed, has been wrongly mentioned as annexure 'F' in the stay order. Annexure 'F' as such is to be read as Annexure 'E'.

4. Similar is the Stay order in the other Civil Rule 389 of 1981, which the petitioner obtained against the respondents, in Civil Rule 389 of 1981,