B.L.HANSARIA, T.C.DAS
State of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Suprabhat Bhadra and 14 Ors. – Respondent
This is a reference under section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the learned Sessions Judge, Nowgong soliciting this Court's opinion on an important question of law. The same is whether a witness in a criminal trial can be allowed to be contradicted with reference to the statement made by him before a Commission of Inquiry constituted under the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, hereinafter the Act.
2. In the case before the learned Sessions Judge, some persons were facing trial under various section of law, including 302 IP'C, One of the charges was that the unlawful assembly had caused the death of one Anil Bora at Hojai Town. To inquire into the circumstances leading to the death of aforesaid Anil, a Commission of Inquiry under the Act had been constituted and which had submitted its report. A petition was, therefore, filed before the trial court on 27.6,80 stating that many charge-sheeted witnesses were examined before the aforesaid Commission, and so for the ends of justice and for proper defence of the accused, the statements of these witnesses before the Commission should be called for. The Presiding Officer by an order dated 5.7.80 allowed this prayer a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.