D.PATHAK, T.C.DAS
Ajit Kumar Barmudoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam & Ors. – Respondent
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is projected against the judgment and order passed by the revisional authority passed on 22.1.82.
2. A brief narration of the facts leading to the present petition is that the Mahkuma Parishad of Tezpur invited tenders for about 59 huts weekly market for settlement for 1981 82. Of these huts Dekorai Weekly Bazar was one of them in which in pursuance to the notice calling for fenders 6 parsons submitted tenders giving bid as follows :
1. Dikaram Hazarika ... Rs. 75,331.00
2. Nripen Bordoloi .. Rs. 71,001.00 (the present respondent No. 5)
3. Uttam Kumar Bordoloi .. Rs. 64,644.44
4. Durga Gohain ... Rs. 65,00100
5. Ajit Kr. Barmudoi Rs. 61,446.00
6. M/S. United Enterprises ... Rs. 77,201.00
3. On opening the tenders and making the comparative statement of the tenders, the Executive Committee of the Mahkuma Parishad settled the aforesaid hut with the present petitioner at Ms. 64,444.44 although his own bid wis Rs. 61,446.00 as mentioned above.
4. The respondent No. 5 Nripjo Birdjloi, Dakaram Hazarika and M./S. United enterprise preferred appeal before the appellate authority. But during the pendency of the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.