SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Gau) 63

D.PATHAK, T.C.DAS
Ajit Kumar Barmudoi – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N.Choudhury, D.K.Talukdat, D.N.Konwar, J.C.Talukdar, B.P.Borah

Pathak, C.J. (Actg.):-

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is projected against the judgment and order passed by the revisional authority passed on 22.1.82.

2. A brief narration of the facts leading to the present petition is that the Mahkuma Parishad of Tezpur invited tenders for about 59 huts weekly market for settlement for 1981 82. Of these huts Dekorai Weekly Bazar was one of them in which in pursuance to the notice calling for fenders 6 parsons sub­mitted tenders giving bid as follows :

1. Dikaram Hazarika ... Rs. 75,331.00

2. Nripen Bordoloi .. Rs. 71,001.00 (the present respondent No. 5)

3. Uttam Kumar Bordoloi .. Rs. 64,644.44

4. Durga Gohain ... Rs. 65,00100

5. Ajit Kr. Barmudoi Rs. 61,446.00

6. M/S. United Enterprises ... Rs. 77,201.00

3. On opening the tenders and making the comparative state­ment of the tenders, the Executive Committee of the Mahkuma Parishad settled the aforesaid hut with the present petitioner at Ms. 64,444.44 although his own bid wis Rs. 61,446.00 as men­tioned above.

4. The respondent No. 5 Nripjo Birdjloi, Dakaram Hazarika and M./S. United enterprise preferred appeal before the appellate authority. But during the pendency of the app




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top