D.PATHAK, K.N.SAIKIA
Collector of Dibrugarh – Appellant
Versus
S. P. Rajkhowa and Another – Respondent
The only question raised in this writ petition is whether for the purpose of determining compensation under Section 12 of the Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act 1956 the expression 'annual land revenue' will include surcharge and local rate payable for the estate.
2. An area of 757 B. 2 K. 9 Lechas owned by M/s. Dibrugarh Company Ltd. having been taken over as excess land under the Assam Fixation of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act 1956 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' the Collector by his order dated 16.6.80 assessed the compensation under Section 12 of the Act at 25 times of the annual land revenue for 279 B. 2K. 16 Ls. and 50 times the land revenue for 477 B 3K. 13Ls.; and on appeal under Sec. 31 of the Act the District Judge Dibrugarh in Misc. Appeal No. 2/81 by the impugned order dated 25.11.81 following an earlier decision in Misc. Appeal No. 5/76 (Sarojini Tea Company vs. The Collector Dibrugarh) allowing the appeal ordered that the Company was "entitled to compensation @ 50 times the Land Revenue 50 times the Local Rates' and 50 times the Land Revenue surcharge in respect of the area of 477B-3K-13Ls. and @ 25 times the Local Rates and 25 times the Lan
Bisra Stone Lime Co. v. Orissa State Electricity Board. AIR 1976 SC 127
Commissioner of Income-Tax Kerala v. K. Srinivasan AIR 1972 SC 491
Deputy Commissioner Kamrup v. Durga Nath Sarma AIR 1968 SC 394
Hememdra Prasad Barua v. Collector of Sibsagar AIR 1976 SC 908]
P. C. Goswami v. Collector of Darrang (1982) 1 SCC 439
Paresh Chandra Chatterjee v. State of Assam AIR 1962 SC 167
Sri Vishwesha Tirtha Swamir v. The State of Maysore AIR 1971 SC 2377
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.