SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Gau) 2

D.PATHAK, K.N.SAIKIA
Gouri Shankar Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Dibrugarh District, Dibrugarh and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.Baruah, D.N.Baruah, D.N.Choudhury

Pathak, C.J. (Acting):-

This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India making a grievance by the petitioner that the land of the petitioner was acquired under Section 9 (1) of the Assam land (Requisition & Acquisition) Act, 1964 but till date the award of compensation has not be3n made in favour of the petitioner.

2. As early as on 22.3.70 the Deputy Commissioner, Lakhimpur District, Dibrugarh by a notice under No. DRLA/2/9170./18 dated 22.3.70 acquired an area of 1 Katha 1 Lecha of land covered by old Dag No. 3268 corresponding to New Dag No. 6 under old periodic Patta No. 82 corresponding to now Periodic Patta No. 83. For the last twelve years the petitioner has been approaching the authorities for making the award of compensation in respect of the said land. The respondents have filed affidavit-in-opposition and they have stated in para 7 of the affidavit that the award could not be made as the Flood Control Depart­ment is yet to sanction the estimated amount. It has further been averred in para 9 of the affidavit-in-opposition that the award in question could not be made as the estimated amount was not sanctioned by the Flood Control Department. Be that as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top