SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Gau) 16

R.K.MANISANA SINGH
Uphras Lapasam and another – Appellant
Versus
Ka Esiboll Lyngdah and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. Lamare and I. Lamare, D.E. Shallam

Judgement

JUDGMENT:- This appeal arises from the judgment and decree passed by the learned District Council Court, Jowai in Misc. Title Civil Appeal No.1 of 1982 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate District Council Court passed in Title 13 of 1980.

2. The appellant instituted Title Suit No.13 of 1980 against the respondents claiming, inter alias, a decree for declaration of right and title of the plaintiff to the disputed forest, in the Court of the Subordinate District Council Court (Trial Court). The learned Trial Court disposed of a preliminary issue relating to res judicata. The learned Trial Court held that the Suit was barred by the principles of res judicata as a result of the decision of the S.D.O., Jowai in Civil Appeal No. 16 of 1951 and dismissed the suit. The appeal from the judgment and decree of the Trial Court to the District Council Court, Jowai was dismissed by the District Council Court in Misc. T. C. Appeal No.1 of 1982. Therefore, the appellant filed MA(S) 3(SH) of 1983 in this Court.

3. Mr. B. Lamare, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the order in Civil Appeal No. 16 of 1951 is a compromise order or decree and as such, it cann








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top