MANISANA
Mohit Kumar Deb Roy & Others – Appellant
Versus
Gaurangalal Roy – Respondent
2. It is a case of concurrent findings of facts. The case of (he plaintiff-landlords is that the defendant-tenant had not paid the rents due from him for the period from November 1978 to October 1981 amounting to Rs. 5400/-. The Court below have given concurrent findings that the landlords refused to accept the rent for the month of November 1978 offered by the tenant; and that the tenant deposited the rent for November 1973 in time as provided under the law; however, the tenant deposited the rent for the month of December also in advance along with the rent for November; and that the amount of Rs. 5400/- had already been deposited, although some of the deposits have been made in advance.
3. Mr. Acharyya submits that some of the deposits made in advance in the Court after October 1978 will not amount to payment under sub-section 4 of section 5 of the Assam Urban Areas Rent Control Act, 1972. His
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.