GAUHATI HIGH COURT
K.Lahiri, J.
Mokshed Ali -Appellant
Versus
Mustt.Safura Khatoon -Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 92 of 1986
Decided On : 17-03-1986
MAINTENANCE - SECTION 125, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
The court observed the increasing number of criminal revisions against orders granting or refusing maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and the plight of poor and neglected parties, particularly wives, who are unable to sustain themselves and their children.
Finding of the Court:
The court recognized the constitutional obligation of the State to provide legal aid or assistance to the poor and neglected, emphasizing that they cannot be denied justice due to their financial circumstances.
Issues: 1. Whether the State has a constitutional obligation to provide legal aid or assistance to the poor and neglected in maintenance cases under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973? 2. How to ensure justice for poor and neglected parties in maintenance cases?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Articles 39A and 14 of the Constitution of India, which emphasize the State's responsibility to ensure justice, liberty, equality, and dignity for all citizens. It also drew inspiration from Aristotle's teachings on the importance of educating citizens in the spirit of the Constitution to ensure its stability and survival.
Final Decision: The court directed the issuance of a Rule calling upon the opposite party to show cause why the impugned order granting maintenance should not be set aside. It also appointed an Amicus Curiae to represent the opposite party free of cost, subject to the payment of fees to be fixed by the Government.
2. Now, the problem is how to provide justice ? What should be done under similar circumstances say, in the instant case ? Can the neglected wife getting a paltry sum of Rs. 175/-per month to sustain herself and her child fight this litigation. This is just an illustrative case. In my opinion the wretched, the poor and the neglected must be given legal aid or assistance by the State. It is the Constitutional obligation of the State, rather it is the Constitutional right of the poor to demand legal assistance from the State. The poor cannot be denied justice merely because they are poor. The solemn pledges imprinted in the preamble to the Constitution of India are to ensure justice, liberty, equality and dignity to the citizen of India. It is the Constitutional right of the poor to demand free legal assistance from the States. They are not to beg for free legal aid. One is only to look at Article 39A and Article 14 of the Constitution, the spirit of the Constitution, to realise that the time has come when the poor must be provided with appropriate legal assistance by the State. It is high time to realise that it is the right of the poor to get equal justice and the said right has been denied to them so long. If, in such cases, the poor divorcee, the neglected children and parents do not get free legal assistance from the State to vindicate their rights I feel that sleeping over the matter would be "anti Constitutional inaction". We should not forget that the Constitution is the Great Charter of Indian social, economic and political liberties,, I earnestly desire that all should understand and know the spirit of the Constitution and perform duties strictly in accordance with the letters and spirit thereof. It high time to recall what Aristotle informed the civilized world way back in mid 300 B. C. He said :
"The greatest of all the means.... for ensuring the stability of Constitutions-but which is nowadays generally neglected-is the education of citizens in the spirit of the Constitution....Licentiousness may exist in a state as in individual persons....The education of a citizen in the spirit of his Constitution does not consist in his doing the actions in which....the adherents of democracy might delight. It consists in doing the actions by which....a democracy will be enabled to survive----The democrat starts by assuming that justice consists in equality; be proceeds to identify equality with the sovereignty of the will of the masses; he ends with the view that 'liberty and equality' consist in 'doing what one likes'......This is a mean conception of liberty. To live by the rule of the Constitution ought not to be regarded as slaver at but rather as salvation".
Vide Politics PP. 233-34 (Emphasis supplied)
Indeed, for ensuring the stability of our constitution and to enable our democracy to survive, teaching of the spirit of the Constitution has become essential. It is necessary for our salvation and to fulfil the cherished pledges imprinted in the preamble to the Constitution. It has assumed great importance for the unity and integrity of the country. Our education policy should envision the necessity to educate all, including the school children, the spirit of the Constitution. I feel that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.