SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Gau) 45

R.K.MANISANA SINGH, S.BARMAN ROY
Mahiram Bora – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.Kataki, R.L.Das , J.Singh, G.K.Bhattacharyya, G.Gopal

R.K.Manisana, J.—

This is an appeal lifer by Mahiram Bora against the conviction made by the Sessions Judge at Lakhimpur on 12.3.92 in Sessions Case No. 76 (NL) of 1989. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is thus. On 24.12.87, at about 7 PM while Paduram Bora (since dead) was returning home from Simulguri accused Mahiram Bora struck him on his head with a mit dao causing service injuries. The injured Paduram was taken to Dhalpur Dispensary in a vehicle. He was again taken to Dibrugarh Medical Hospital at the advise of the Doctor, but he died there on 4.1.88. On trial, the Sessions Judge convicted the accused under section 302, IPC, and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 500/-. Hence this appeal.

2. There is no direct evidence. Prosecution relies on confession recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C., extra-judicial confession and other circumstances. The defence of the accused was that Paduram was injured in self-defence.

3. PW 1 Joy Ram Bora is brother of the deceased Paduram and was the informant. He did not see the occurrence. His evidence is that injured Paduram was taken to Dhalpur Dispensary in a vehicle from the place where he was lying injured. He










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top