SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Gau) 14

T.C.DAS
Jhabarmal Panda – Appellant
Versus
Bhagawati Prasad Kedia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P. Bhattacharjee, P.K. Goswami and A. Roy, N.M. Lahiri, D.N. Barua, G.N. Sahewalla and A.K. Maheswari

Judgement

This revision petition is projected against the judgment and order dated 25-4-87 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dibrugarh in title Appeal No. 1 of 1986 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner and upholding the judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant District Judge in Title Suit No. 13 of 1985. It appears that this is the second time that the petitioner has approached this Court with this revision petition. The facts leading to this petition may briefly be stated hereunder.

2. That the petitioner has been in occupation of the premises belonging to the opposite party as a monthly tenant according to English calendar month under a registered (iced of lease commencing with effect from 1-4-84 to 31-3-87. The rent was fixed al Rs. 550/- per month. Though the petitioner paid rent for few months, he defaulted to payment to the plaintiff since Sept., 1984. The plaintiff-opposite party required the premises bona fide for his own use and occupation and as the petitioner was a defaulter in payment of rent a notice was issued asking him to vacate the premises and to clear up all arrear dues. The petitioner having failed to comply with the terms of the noti

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top