SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Gau) 114

B.P.SARAF
Tulsi Roy – Appellant
Versus
Pijush Kanti Roy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.Senapati, M.K.Sharma, J.P.Bhattacharjee, B.L.Singh

This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Assistant District Judge No.2, Cachar at Silchar in Title Appeal No. 38 of 1976 affirming the judgment and decree passed by the Sadar Munsiff No. l Silchar.

2. The case of the plaintiff was that the suit land originally belonged to Krishna Kishore Rai, who died in the year 197.1 leav­ing behind him his son, Romesh Chandra Roy and wife, Surusi Bala Roy. Romesh Chandra Roy died leaving behind two sons, who are plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 (Pijush Kaoti Roy and Asit Baran Roy and the widow - plaintiff No. 3 (Surusibala Roy). The three plaintiffs thus inherited the properties involved in the suit on the death of Romesh Chandra Roy. The mother of the defendant, Bidya Sundari Roy, was a maid servant working in the plaintiffs' family. The suit land was given to her by a lease deed by the plaintiff - Surusi Bala Roy, executed on 8.1.54. Bidya Sundari Roy did not construct any permanent structure within five years on the suit land. The suit land was part and parcel of the homestead of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs bonafide required the suit land for expansion of residence. A notice, therefore, was served on the defendant
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top