SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Gau) 125

MANISANA
Susan Das and Others – Appellant
Versus
Hemlata Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.Choudhury, G.N.Sahewalla, A.K.Goswami

This revision petition arises from the order of the Judicial Magistrate of the first class Sibsagar made OH 28.4.1989 in CR Case No 779C of 1980 rejecting the prayer of the petitioners Smti Sarbeswari Das and Smti Minu Das for dispensing with their examination under section 313(1)(b), Cr PC in view of proviso to sub-section (1) of section 313, CrPC on the ground that the accusation against them is under section 323, IPC which is a summons-case, and that the Court has dispensed with their personal attendance. It is stated in their application for exemp­tion from examination that the petitioner Sarbeswari Das is an ailing woman and the petitioner Minu Das is living with her husband in an interior village in Hojai, District, Nagaon. The Magistrate rejected the prayer mainly on the ground that the case was not tried in accordance with the procedure for the trial of summons-case, that is, the trial was not under Chapter XX of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offence under section 323, IPC is punishable with im­prisonment not exceeding one year and, therefore, it is a summons case. The Court also has dispensed with the perso



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top