SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Gau) 160

B.P.SARAF
Tazabannisa – Appellant
Versus
Sadaruddin Ahmed – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Goswami, M.Das

Whether a plea of non-joinder falls within the scope of Order 6 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter 'C. P. C.') is the sole question for determination in this petition. The petitioners were plaintiffs in a suit filed in the Court of Munsiff against the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer in a perfect partition case. As some of the recorded owners were dead at the time of filing of the suit, their legal representatives were made proforma defendants. The main defendants, being defendant Nos. 1 to 3 filed written statement wherein one of the plea taken was that the suit was bad for non-joinder of all the heirs of the recorded owner. On the aforesaid pleading in the written statement, an issue was also framed -Whether the suit is bad for non-joinder of all the heirs of the re­corded owners.

2. The plaintiffs thereupon filed a petition under Order 6 Rule 5 of the C. P. C. praying for a direction to the main defendants to supply the names and addresses of the heirs of the deceased recorded owners who according to them had not been joined as parties, f he petition was objected to by the defendants. The learned Munsiff by order dated 26. 4. 82 dismissed the petition







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top