SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Gau) 60

R.K.MANISANA SINGH
Binapani Purkayastha – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Kumar Purkayastha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.Acharyya, S.K.Senapati, R.Zaman, N.M.Ganguly, B.K.Acharyya, A.K.Deb, D.C.Chakraborty

This appeal arises from the judgment and decree passed by the Assis­tant District Judge (2) Gauhati in T.A. No.11 of 1975 from the judgment and decree passed by the Munsiff (II) Gauhati in T. S. No. 2 of 1972.

2. Facts giving rise to this appeal, in, brief are as follows. The plaintiffs instituted the suit in the Court of the Munsiff for fore­closure of mortgaged property (suit land) having an area of 12 Bighas. The case of the plaintiffs is thus. Three sister, namely Sabitri Bala, Basanti Bala and Binapani (since deceased) mortgaged the suit land to the plaintiff-1 and the plaintiff-2's father by executing a registered mortgage deed dated 18. 6. 51 for a loan of Rs. 1350/-advanced to them with interest @ 12%. The mortgagors delivered possession of the mortgaged property on 18. 6. 51 to the mortgagees and authorised them to receive profits from the suit land and appropriate the same towards interest. It was also stipulated in the mortgage that the sum of Rs. 1350/- would be paid by the mortgagors within three (3) years, and that if the mortgagors failed to pay the mortgaged-money, or mortgagors failed to redeem the property within the stipulated period of three (3) years, the mortga
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top