SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Gau) 150

S.N.PHUKAN
Amal Chandra Suklabaidya – Appellant
Versus
Bidhu Bala Roy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.N.Sahewalla, A.R.Paul Majumdar, S.Dutta, B.K.Acharyya

This second appeal is by the defendants.

2. The plaintiffs filed the suit praying for a decree for declaration of the suit land measuring more or less 3 Bighas on contiguous north of Dag No. 56 of 2nd R.S. Patta No. 15, Mouja Rukni part-I. Ph. David sonabad as accretions to their periodic patta land and as such part and parcel of their land and also for a declaration of their title as periodic settlement holder over the suit land. Plaintiffs have also prayed for confirmation of possession or in the alternative for recovery of khas possession and further for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from entering into the suit land and interfering with their possession. The suit was contested by the defendants. The State of Assam was also made a party and a written statement has been filed.

3. The basis on which the plaintiffs have claimed the suit land is stated in para-1 of the plaint which runs as follows :

"That the plaintiffs are the owners and possessors of land of Dag No. 56 of 2nd R.S. Patta No. 15 of Mouja Rukni Part-I, Pa. Davidsonabad, District Cachar. The river Rukni was originally flowing north of this dag land and it gradually and imperceptivity receded towards furt























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top