SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Gau) 271

S.N.PHUKAN
Akhilesh Chandra Balo – Appellant
Versus
Prova Das Roy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Medhi, P.K.Goswami, P.G.Barua, A.C.Dutta

The present petition under section 115, Civil Procedure Code is by the defendants.

2. The plaintiffs-opposite parties filed a Title Suit before the learned Assistant District Judge, Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur praying for a decree for declaration of title and khas possession over the land described in the Schedule B to the plaint and also for mesne profit. In the plaint attachment before judgment of the paddy cultivated on the said land for this year was prayed for and it was also prayed that a receiver be appointed. Only one petition was filed alongwith the plaint under Order 38 Rule 5 and Order 40 Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code and the said petition is available at Annexure I to the present petition. In this petition, in para 7, it was stated that the defendants illegally raised paddy in the above land in spite of objection by the plaintiffs and accordingly, it was prayed that a receiver may be appointed for the purpose of reaping and harvesting the paddy and also for future cultivation. A joint prayer was also made for conditional attachment of the land pending final orders.

3. By order dated 5.11.90, the learned trial Court after hearing the learned counsel for the plaintiffs and af










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top