SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Gau) 15

U.L.BHAT
Mango Ice Cream Company – Appellant
Versus
Dena Bank – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.Das, G.Mishra , C.K.Sharma Barua

Defendants in Money Suit No. 38 of 1984 on the file of the Assistant District Judge No. 2, Gauhati are the revision petitioners herein. The suit was filed by the present opposite party, namely, Dena Bank for realisation of money said to have been advanced to the second revision "petitioner, who borrowed the money for the purpose of running a business in the name and style of the first revision petitioner. The suit was resisted on several grounds. The suit came up in due course for trial and ah officer of the Bank was examined on behalf of the Bank and the suit was adjourned for examining defendants' witnesses several times. The suit came up for examining defend­ants' witness on 24.6.85. On that day defendants were absent. Learned counsel for the defendants filed an application praying for adjournment of the suit averring that the second revision petitioner `is attacked with high blood pressure for which, his wife also could not be present in the Court to day." The Court heard the learned counsel for both sides and dismissed the application on the following grounds :

''It appears that several dates were given to the defendant for adducing their evidence. No further date could be give











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top