SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Gau) 42

S.N.PHUKAN
Arun Singhvi – Appellant
Versus
State Through Weights and Measures Inspectorate, Tezpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.Bhatra , S.Kataki, T.C.Khetri

This revision petition is directed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sonitpur at Tezpur in Criminal Appeal No. l7 (S-2) of 1989 affirming the order o. conviction and sentence passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Tezpur in C.R.Case No 281 of 1989.

2. On 4.5.89 a Mobile Court was conducted at Tezpur town by the Judicial Magistrate and in the present case the accused-petitioner was found guilty under section 23 of the Assam Weights & Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1958, for short Assam Act. The accused pleaded guilty and accordingly he was convicted and sentenced to fine of Rs.300/-. While conducting the Mobile Court an offence report was submitted before the trial Court as the accused-petitioner was found in possession of a non-metric tailor's tap. The offence was explained and the accused pleaded guilty.

3. The lower appellate Court rejected the contention made on behalf of the accused that using of non-standard measure that is, tailor's tap can not be brought within the provisions of section 23 of the Assam Act. Lower appellate Court also rejected the contention on behalf of the accused that from the seizure list it would appear that in the tailor's tap both centi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top