D.N.BARUAH
Babul Ali – Appellant
Versus
Khirada Dutta – Respondent
2. The petitioner's case is that the predecessor-in-interest of the respondent 1 (a) to 1 (e) instituted a suit (TS No. 16 of 1965) praying for a decree, inter alia, for recovery of khas possession of 18 lechas of land covered by Dag No. 45 (old) Periodic Patta No.209 (old) corresponding to new Dag No.55 of Simaluguri Town, Dhopabar Mouza, in the district of Sibsagar. In the plaint, however the boundary of the suit land was not shown. The suit was decreed. An appeal preferred by the defendants/petitioners, was also dismissed. Second appeal was filed which was also dismissed. The original plaintiff as well as the defendants died and the present petitioner and the defendant No. 1 (a) to l(e) were substituted in their places.
3. The petitioner's further case is that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.