SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Gau) 142

U.L.BHAT, N.G.DAS
Commissioner of Income Tax, NE Region, Shillong – Appellant
Versus
Mulchand Sukmal Jain, Guwahati – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Joshi, G.K.Joshi, D.K.Talukdar

U.L. Bhat, C.J.-—

This reference under section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for short 'the Act' has been made at the instance of the Revenue, the following is the question referred to the High Court.

“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in holding that there was valid partition for purpose of section 171 Of the Income Tat Act, 1961, in the HUF consisting of son and mother only ?"

2. The assessment in queition relates to the assessment year 1979-80 The assessed is a Hindu undivided family consisting of a son and his mother duly. The assessee contended before the income-tax Officer that there was or oral partition or family arrangement which took effect from 4.4.79 and confirmation of the same the parties executed a document on 18.5.79 and under the partition immovable properties described in Schedule B were allotted to son and movable properties described in Schedule C were allotted to the mother and thereafter they have been enjoying the properties separately. On these averments it was contended that HUF cannot be assessed and the individuals may be assessed. The Income-tax Officer overruled this contention on the ground that th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top