SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Gau) 90

W.A.SHISHAK, H.K.SEMA
G. Elsan and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Prasad, L.S.Jamir, E.Y.Renthungo, C.Jajo

H. K. Sema, J.—

This writ petition is preferred by writ petitioners, 97 in numbers.

2. We have heard Mr. P. Prasad assisted by Miss C. Jajo, learned counsel for the petitioners. We have also heard Mr. EY Renthungo, learned Junior Govt. Advocate for the respondents.

3. The petitioners are at present employed under the Nagaland Hand-loom and Handicrafts Development Corporation (in short NHHDC» under various capacities as Weaving Superintendent, Weaving Inspector, Accountant Craftsman, Craft Inspector, Marketing Assistant, Manager Peon, Chowkidar, Sweeper, Typist etc. Most of the petitioners are the holders of non-Gazetted posts accept few. The NHHDC was established for the first time on 1st May, 1979.

4. Prior to the establishment of NHHDC, the petitioners were the employees under the Directorate of Industries. Their appointments were made some times in between the years 1967 and 1978. Appointment of the petitioners to various posts are available at Annexures A to E in this writ petition. All the appointments of the petitioners were made to various p ists under the Directorate of Industries and as would appear from Annexures A to E, that the initial appointment of the petitioners were ma



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top