SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Gau) 106

R.K.MANISANA SINGH, S.BARMAN ROY
Zeenat Fatema Rashid – Appellant
Versus
MD. Iqbal Anwar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Talukdar, P.K.Barua, A.Das Gupta, T.N.Phukan

R. K. Manisana, J.—

This revision petition arises from an order of the Principal Judge of the Family Court at Guwahati made on 7.8.92 in Case No FC(Cril) No. 111/92/74-M/90.

2. Facts,-The case of the petitioner,in brief, is thus. The petitioner Zeenat Fatema Rashid married Md. Iqbal Anwar, on 2.12.87, according to Muslim rites. After the marriage they lived as husband and wife at husband's residence. She had borne him a son on 3.11.89. After that she was ill treated by her husband and her in law. She, therefore, instituted a criminal case on 13.8.90 being Case No. 87 of 1990. Finding no other alternative, she had to leave her husband's house and had to file a criminal case for getting back her properties and those properties were recovered on 31.8.90. She also filed a case under section 125, CrPC, against her husband on 29.3.90 claimining maintenance for herself and her minor child. Md. Iqbal Anwar (the respondent) contested the case by filing written statement. His main defence is that he had divorced his wife, the petitioner herein, on 31.8.90.

3. The Family Court has held that there had been a divorce duly affected and, therefore, for maintenance would be determined under section 3










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top