M.SHARMA
On The Death of Chouthmal Jalan Legal Heirs Namely Smti Ratna Devi Jalan – Appellant
Versus
Pramila Paul and Another – Respondent
2. Original plaintiff, late Chouthmal Jalan filed the above mentioned suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the opposite parties.
3. The case of the petitioners/plaintiffs is that they and the opposite parties have plots of land which are contiguous to each other and that the land under occupation of the defendant/opposite parties is on the north side of the petitioners' land and the petitioners have been enjoying uninterrupted flow of light and air from the north for 50 years or more; that except brick wall on some part, the rest of the boundary between the petitioners and the opposite parties are not demarcated, that the opposite parties are intending to raise construction in such a manner that the flow of light and air to the premises of the plaintiff will be blocked and interrupted. The petitioners' further apprehension is that the opposite parties may encroach upon their land by using the construction and that may already have encroached upon some of their land. Therefore, petitioners prayed for permanent injunction for res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.