SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Gau) 196

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
M.Sharma, J.
Homen Borgohain and Ors. -Appellant
Versus
Brahmaputra Valley Regional Handloom Weavers Co- Operative Society Ltd. -Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 359 of 1994
Decided On : 30-09-1994

Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Barman, J.M.Choudhary, H.Deka, D.K.Bhattacharyya, B.M.Choudhary, A.R.Barthakur, T.G.Barua

A co-operative society cannot be said to be defamed by an imputation that would not be defamatory of an individual, and the society has no locus standi to file a complaint for defamation unless it has suffered special damage or the words are likely to cause pecuniary damage.

Headnote:

DEFAMATION - MAINTAINABILITY OF COMPLAINT - LOCUS STANDI OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY - SECTION 199(1) CRPC - INTERPRETATION - IMPUTATION OF DEFAMATION TO SOCIETY AS A WHOLE - ANALYSIS OF NEWS ITEM - IDENTIFICATION OF PERSON DEFAMED - DISTINCTION BETWEEN IMPUTATION TO INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIETY - MEANING AND INTENTION OF WORDS USED - APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 500 IPC.

Fact of the Case:

A news item published in an Assamese weekly alleged misappropriation of funds by the Managing Director of the Brahmaputra Valley Regional Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. The society filed a complaint for defamation under sections 500/501/502 read with section 34 IPC. The accused petitioners challenged the maintainability of the complaint, arguing that the Managing Director, not the society, was the aggrieved person and that section 199(1) CrPC barred the proceedings.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the news item did not contain any defamatory statement imputing the society as a whole and causing harm or humiliation to it in the public eye. The Court found that the imputation was directed solely at the Managing Director, Mr. Jagannath Sarma, and that the mention of the society in the latter part of the news item was not intended to impute the society.

Issues: 1. Whether the news item contained defamatory statements imputing the society as a whole, causing harm and humiliation to it in the public eye. 2. Whether the society had locus standi to file the complaint for defamation.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court interpreted section 499(Explanation 2) IPC, which provides that it may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such. The Court held that the collection of persons must be identifiable to be defamed. 2. The Court analyzed the news item and found that the imputation was directed solely at the Managing Director, Mr. Jagannath Sarma. The Court held that the mention of the society in the latter part of the news item was not intended to impute the society but to substantiate the allegation of misappropriation against the Managing Director. 3. The Court held that the society was not the aggrieved person under section 500 IPC and therefore had no locus standi to file the complaint for defamation.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in the complaint case.

This revision petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing the Complaint Case No. 983 of 1993 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Guwahati and the entire proceeding therein and also the order dated 1.6.94 passed by the said Magistrate explaining the offence under section 500/501/502 read with section 34 IPC.

2. Plea against the maintainability of the complaint in the above mentioned complaint case has been raised to the effect that person aimed against in the impugned news item is not the Brahmaputra Valley Regional Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Society Ltd. but the Managing Director Mr. Jagannath Sarma. and that as the Managing Director Mr. Sarma did not file the complaint as the person aggrieved, the defamation case filed at the instance of the co-operative society is not maintainable.

3. The five petitioners, namely, petitioner No. 1 Homen Borgohain is the Editor of Asom Bani, an Assamese Weekly, petitioner Nos. 2, 3 and 4 PG Baruah, Binu Baruah and Surajit Govinda Baruah are the partners of M/s Asom Bani and petitioner No.5 Hari Chandra Bora is the Printer and Publisher of Asom Bani.

4. Complainant opposite party, namely, The Brahmaputra Valley Regional Handloom Weavers Co-operative Society Ltd. represented by its PRO Shri Prabhat Chandra Sarma, is a co-operative society under Assam Co-operative S.ocieties Act, 1949 and engaged in manufacturing Cloth Production Scheme under the State Level Implementation Committee (SLIC). The Managing Director of the complainant society is Shri Jagannath Sarma.

5. The opposite party as complainant filed complaint case as mentioned above under section 500/501/502 read with section 34 of the IPC alleging defamation by virtue of a news item published in the said Assamese weekly Asom Bani dated 3.9.93 in the column "Dispur Darshan" under the caption "Choror Murat Tel" (Oil on the head of the thief). The complainant felt humiliated and aggrieved as the news item tarnished the reputation of the complainant in the public eyes. The news item was published in Assamese and the English translation has been reproduced as below :

" An allegation of misappropriation of more than two hundred crores of rupees is raised against Shri Jagannalh Sarma, the Managing Director of the Brahmaputra Valley Regional Weavers' Co-operative Society. As the amount is more than two hundred crores of rupees the Chief Minister was compelled to commit in the Assembly that the matter would be enquired into through the CBI, however, no enquiry is started till today. The opposition parties also stopped raising the issue of Jagannath Sarma's corruption on the floor of the Assembly. Their mysterious silence has created various confusions in the minds of many. The big thing is that the Directorate of Handloom and Weaving, in spite of having clear proof of misappropriation of several hundred crores of ruppes, has even in this year instructed Brahmaputra Valley Co-operative Society to manufacture Janala Cloth so that several millions of rupees can he collected, h is worth saying by the elders that King's dear needs no Palanguin Carrier. "

6. On the basis of the complaint, the trial Court took cognizance and issued c process and on receipt of summons the petitioners appeared and on the date, ie, on 1.6.94, fixed for explaining the offence to the accused persons, an application was filed praying for dropping the proceedings, initiated on the complaint petition on the ground that offence of defamation under section 500/501/502 1PC has not been disclosed on the basis of the complaints and that a legal bar existed for taking cognizance thereof and continuing the proceedings under section 199(1) CrPC.

7. Mr. DK Bhattacharyya, learned counsel for the petitioners mainly advanced his arguments insisting that, inline news item no materials appear which can be considered to be an imputation of defamation against the complainant society, that the Managing Director Mr. J. Surma who is the actual aggrieved person has not filed any c




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top