SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Gau) 38

V.K.KHANNA, ANUP DEB
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Hasija Coal Traders – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. K. Sarma and P. K. Tiwari, N. M. Lahiri, G. N. Sahewalla and A. K. Goswami

Judgement

KHANNA, C.J.:-This appeal has been filed against the decision of the learned single Judge given in Civil Rule No. 639 of 1993 (Hasija Coal Traders v. Union of India).

2. We have heard Mr. B. K. Sarma assisted by Mr. P. K. Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India and Mr. N. M. Lahiri assisted by Mr. G. N. Sahewalla and Mr. A. K. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent/ petitioner.

3. The brief facts for the purpose of adjudicating the controversy raised in this appeal are that the petitioner/respondent Hasija Coal Traders is a proprietary firm carrying on the business of sale and supply of coal. The coal is being loaded from Baihata Jogighopa Railway Station. According to the petitioner/respondent there is no weigh bridge for the purpose of weighing coal loaded in wagons at the Railway Station and for the purpose of determining the carrying capacity of particular wagon, the Railway authorities have provided various measurement for wagons regarding permissible carrying capacity and if the loading is made up to a particular height then loading will not exceed the permissible carrying capacity. After the coal is loaded in accordance with















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top