M.SHARMA
Gokul Chandra Das – Appellant
Versus
Satish Chandra Das – Respondent
2. The opposite party as plaintiff filed the Title Suit No. 15 of 1994 for declaration of title and recovery of khas possession contending in the plaint that he got settlement of the land measuring about 7 bighas and had been dispossessed by the defendant (appellant) on 4.3.83 and took away mustard seeds etc grown by him and therefore filed the suit as stated above. The appellants/defendants contested the suit, denying all along the title of the plaintiff opposite party as well as his possession and took the plea of adverse possession over the land in their written statement as well as in their evidence.
3. The trial Court dismissed the suit and on appeal the lower appellate Court decreed the suit by reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court. Hence this appeal preferred by the defendant.
4. As many as seven issues were framed and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.