V.K.KHANNA, A.K.PATNAIK
Satya Sandhya Das – Appellant
Versus
Chintamani Sharma and Ors. – Respondent
This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 30.3.95 allowing Civil Rule No.2429 of 1993 filed by the petitioner-respondent Sri Chintamani Sharma.
2. At the admission stage, we have heard Mr. NM Lahjri, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri AK Phukan and Sri VM Thomas, Advocates appearing for the appellant (respondent No.4 in the Civil Rule), Mr. SR Bhattacharjee, assisted by Mr. HA Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent-writ petitioner and Mr. BC Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the State-respondents.
3. The brief facts for the purpose of adjudicating the present appeal ate that few posts of lecturer in Pragjyotish College, Guwahati fell vacant for which an advertisement was made which has been quoted in extenso in the judgment under appeal. In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement besides the petitioner-respondent, the appellant (respondent No.4 in the Civil Rule) and others applied and according to the Rules the Governing Body took interview for the purpose of preparing a select lust. It is not disputed that the name of the contesting respondent-petitioner was placed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.