SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Gau) 192

V.K.KHANNA, A.K.PATNAIK
Satya Sandhya Das – Appellant
Versus
Chintamani Sharma and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.Lahiri, H.A.Sarkar, B.C.Das, A.K.Phukan, S.R.Bhattacharjee, V.M.Thomas, S.Bhuyan

VK Khanna, C J.—

This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 30.3.95 allowing Civil Rule No.2429 of 1993 filed by the petitioner-respondent Sri Chintamani Sharma.

2. At the admission stage, we have heard Mr. NM Lahjri, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri AK Phukan and Sri VM Thomas, Advocates appearing for the appellant (respondent No.4 in the Civil Rule), Mr. SR Bhattacharjee, assisted by Mr. HA Sarkar, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent-writ petitioner and Mr. BC Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the State-respondents.

3. The brief facts for the purpose of adjudicating the present appeal ate that few posts of lecturer in Pragjyotish College, Guwahati fell vacant for which an advertisement was made which has been quoted in extenso in the judgment under appeal. In pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement besides the petitioner-respondent, the appellant (respondent No.4 in the Civil Rule) and others applied and according to the Rules the Governing Body took interview for the purpose of preparing a select lust. It is not disputed that the name of the contesting respondent-petitioner was placed









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top