S.BARMAN ROY
Ruben Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
Biren Dutta – Respondent
2. The case of the petitioners is that the suit was instituted on 25.7.94. In the said suit, some ad interim injunction order was passed on the vary day when the said suit was filed. Soon, thereafter on 30.7.94, petitioner No. 2 Dr. Satyendra Narayan Choudhury was kidnapped by some extremist belonging to some under ground organisation and he was kept in wrongful confinement in some village for about a month and ultimately on 30.8.94 petitioner No. 2 was recovered by the police. Petitioner No. 1 Dr. Ruben Choudhury is the son of the petitioner No. 2. In the petition various other instances of violence and application of criminal force have been referred for which, the petitioners apprehend danger to their lives at b Nalbari. I do not like to discuss all such incidents in detail in this order. But the fact that the petitioner No. 2 was kidnapped on 30.7.94 and he was ultimately rescued by the police about a month thereafter has not been denied by the respondent in their counter af
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.