SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Gau) 104

M.SHARMA
Ram Karanji More – Appellant
Versus
Keshardev Jalan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B. K. Goswami, V. K. Dewan and Mrs. T. Goswami, G. N. Sahewalla, for Respondent

Judgement

ORDER :- This revision petition has been preferred by the Revision petitioner against the judgment and decree dated 31-10-95 passed by the Assistant District Judge, Dibrugarh in Title Appeal No. 39 of 1985 reversing the judgment and decree dated 31-7-85 and 3-8-85 respectively passed by the Munsiff No. 1, Dibrugarh in Title Suit No. 111 of 1981.

2. The respondent as plaintiff filed the above mentioned Title Suit against the Revision Petitioner as defendant for ejectment from the suit premises on the ground of defaulter, bona fide requirement and unauthorised construction.

3. The plaintiff/respondents case was that he is the owner of the suit premises described in the Schedule of the plaint. The suit premises originally belonged to M/s. Jugal Kishore Kanaiyalal at New Market, Dibrugarh. Being the Karta of the undivided Hindu family, the plaintiff became the owner of the property in question by a partial partition amongst the family members and became the absolute owner,thereof. The defendant came into occupation of the premises as monthly tenant according to English Calendar month agreeing to pay rent at the end of each English month. Further agreement was t
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top