SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Gau) 75

D.N.CHOWDHURY
Promila Boro – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.A.Laskar, D.P.Chaliha

This writ application was originally filed by one Khagen Chandra Boro, who was an employee of this Registry and during the pendency of his application the petitioner died and his wife and son were substituted in his place. The charge on the petitioner is at Annexure 1 i.e. quoted below :

"The Gauhati High Court

No.HC.V-66/90/23106/Estt Dated 25.10.90

To, Shri Khagen Boro, Barakandaz.

Gauhati High Court, Guwahati, Dated Guwahati the 25th October, 1990.

It is reported that from the last six months, you have not attended your duties properly. You come to office at 10.00 AM and after putting your signature on the Register Book, leave office without any intimation to the authority which amounts to gross indiscipline and negligence of duty on your part.

You are, therefore, asked to explain as to why disciplinary action should not be taken against you for your indiscipline and negligence of duty on your part.

You should submit your explanation to the undersigned within 3 days from the date of receipt of this communication.

Sd/- R. Ahmed, 25.10.90, Deputy Registrar (Admn)"

2. The petitioner filed his show cause and denied the charge so levelled against him and thereafter a regular enquiry was cond







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top