Civil Revision No. 371 of 1993 has been filed by the plaintiff challenging the order dated 20-8-93 passed by the Munsiff No. 2, Tinsukia in Title Suit No. 4/92 (T.S. 3/85 (old). By the impugned order the learned Munsiff allowed the prayer of Opposite Party No. 2 to be added as Pro forma-Defendant in that suit.

2. Civil Revision No. 372/93 in T. S. No. 7/92 (T.S. 4/85 old) has been filed by the plaintiff and there also by the order of the same date the Opposite Party No. 2 was added as pro forma-defendant in the suit, that is, (In T.S. No. 7/92 and T.S. No. 4/85 old).

3. Civil Revision No. 373/93 (In T.S. No. 24/92 (T.S. 3/85 old) also has been filed against the order of the same date.

4. Civil Revision No. 374 of 1993 is also filed against the order of the same date in Title Suit No. 23/92 (T.S. No. 2/85 old).

5. The Civil Revision No. 44 of 1994 has been filed by Lakhanlalji Mandir Suraksha Samitee against the order dated 24-1-94 passed by the Munsiff No. 1 at Tinsukia in Title Suit No. 5 of 1987 and by that order the learned Munsiff did not allow the application of this petitioner to be added as party in the suit.

6. The Civil Revision No. 45 of 1994 is also filed against th