These 2 (two) revision petitions are directed against a common judgment and order passed by the learned ADC (J) Mokokchung in Civil Appeal No.3 of 1996. Similar grounds have been taken in both the petitions. Hence by a common judgment I propose to dispose of these 2 (two) petitions.

2.1 have heard Mr. CT Jamir, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. BN Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents at length. Learned counsel of both sides have taken me through relevant documents filed in the above petitions including the impugned orders passed by the learned ADC (J) Mokokchung. Further relevant Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police which are in vogue in the State of Nagaland have also been perused with the help of both the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. After giving thought to the various grounds that have been raised in the above petitions. I am of the view that I need not decide the merit of the case. Mr. CT Jamir submits that in the nature of the present case the provision of Order 21 Rule 37 CPC will not come into play inasmuch as the matter does not relate money suit. It has also been contended that the impugned orders having been passed witho

Click Here to Read the rest of this document