SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Gau) 74

D.BISWAS
Workmen of Haroocharai Tea Estate – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.J.Talukdar, A.Bhattacharyya

This petition has been preferred by Workmen of Haroocharai Tea Estate represented by General Secretary, Assam Chah Karmachari Sangha, Dibrugarh invoking the powers of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of the Govt. refusing to refer a dispute to the Labour Court for adjudication. The relevant order passed by the Govt. vide Memo No. GLR 261/ 93/19-A dated the 3rd November, 1994 reads as follows :

"I am directed to refer to the letters quoted above, and to say that there appears no dispute upon the matter.

As such, party concerned may be intimated from your end accordingly."

It may be placed on record that Baijnath Tewari was a driver of the respondent No. 4 and had been serving in the tea estate for the last five years honestly and diligently. The workman enjoyed all the benefits to which a workman is entitled to and there has been no allegation against his conduct during his tenure of service as driver. But the respondent No.4, all on a sudden did not allow the workman to join his duty with effect from 1.9.92.

2. The matter was referred by the Association to the State Govt. for referring the dispute to the competent authority under section 10 of the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top