SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Gau) 136

V.DUTTA GYANI, D.BISWAS
Adari Chaudhury and Other – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Other – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Sarkar, A.K.Dey , J.L.Sarkar, P.N.Choudhary

V. Dutta Gyani, C.J. (Acting)--

Basic facts of this case are substantially admitted. The only difference is

on the nature of a defence set up by the respondents, otherwise it is an admitted position that the father of petitioner Nos. 2 to 4 and the husband of petitioner No. 1 was picked up by the Army on 13th September, 1997.

2. While the writ petitioners' claim is that on 13.9.97, at about 4 PM a group of Army personnel came to the tea stall while Bhupen Choudhury, their father was engaged in his own tea stall he was asked to go with them to their camp. Handing over the charge of his tea stall to one of his sons, he went with the Army personnel. At the same time another person by name Sri Krishna Sharma was also picked up, who was the Manager of nearby tea stall. When he did not return by the night the petitioners with four other local persons went to Khairabari Army camp around 9 AM, they reached at the gate of the Army camp and requested the Sentry on duty to allow them to meet the Major. An Army personnel wrote the names of the petitioners and other persons on a slip of paper and went inside. After a while the persons came back, with few others and started scolding them and did n



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top