This criminal revision petition is so preferred by the petitioner Smti Krishna Goswami under section 19 (4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with section 397 CrPC challenging the propriety of the judgment and order dated 7.7.97 so passed in a proceeding under section 125 CrPC by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Guwahati in Case No. FC (Criminal) 137 of 1992. In the said proceeding the present petitioner Smti Krishna Goswami happened to be the first party whereas her husband Shri Sudhan Goswami happened to be the 2nd party-opposite party. The operative part of the judgment under challenge runs as under: "The respondent avers that she has been pulling by doing private tuition and residing in a rented house. She has however not disclosed how much she is earning by doing private tuition. It appears that she has capacity to maintain herself out of the income received from private tuition. The respondent is therefore liable to pay maintenance allowance to his daughter only in custody of the respondent. Though the respondent has denied having any source of income, I am inclined to believe that he has sufficient income to maintain himself and his minor daughter and as such he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document