SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Gau) 185

V.DUTTA GYANI
Kalu Barman and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.R.De, M.Nath, J.Singh, K.Deka

This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 27.2.88 passed by Sessions Judge, Nalbari in Sessions Case No.39 (N)/86 thereby holding the appellants guilty of offence punishable under section 326/149 IPC and sentencing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years with fine of Rs.2,000 each and in default of payment of fine to suffer 3 months RI. The accused-appellants were also charged under sections 323/149 and 302/149 IPC, but they have been acquitted of these charges by the trial Court and no appeal against acquittal by State of Assam has been preferred.

2. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence as recorded by the trial Court, the accused-appellants have preferred this appeal. It is mainly assailed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, on the ground that the evidence adduced by the prosecution in support of the charge under section 326/149 IPC is wholly untrustworthy and unreliable. The conviction as recorded by the trial Court is, therefore, liable to be set aside.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor Mrs Deka on the other hand, maintains that the conviction as recorded by the trial Court is well supported by evidence and it does not call for any interference.

4. Befo















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top