V.DUTTA GYANI
Kalu Barman and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
2. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence as recorded by the trial Court, the accused-appellants have preferred this appeal. It is mainly assailed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants, on the ground that the evidence adduced by the prosecution in support of the charge under section 326/149 IPC is wholly untrustworthy and unreliable. The conviction as recorded by the trial Court is, therefore, liable to be set aside.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor Mrs Deka on the other hand, maintains that the conviction as recorded by the trial Court is well supported by evidence and it does not call for any interference.
4. Befo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.