A.K.PATNAIK
Biswakarma Trading Co. – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura and Ors. – Respondent
2. Mr. Sushil Chandra Saha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a reading of the proviso to section 20 of the Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976, (for short, the 1976 Act), would show that normally an appeal is not entertained by the appellate authority unless he is satisfied that the amount of a tax assessed or the penalty levied has been paid. But in clause (ii) of the said proviso, it is stated that the appellate authority, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, may direct the appellant to pay any lesser amount which shall not be less than fifty percent of the tax assessed or fifty percent of the penalty levied and, on payment of the amount so directed, may entertain the appeal.
3. Mr. Saha pointed out that for the year 1996-97, the total amount of tax that had been assessed was Rs.5,17,176.16 and the total amo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.