SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 2

D.N.CHOWDHURY, D.BISWAS
General Manager, N. F. Railway, Maligaon – Appellant
Versus
Jitendra Shah and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Khataniar, K.Basar, B.Kalita

D. N. Chowdhury, J. —

This appeal has been filed under section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the common Award dated 23.11.89 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kamrup, Guwahati in a number of claim cases arising out of the same accident.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant Railways and the learned counsel for the respondents..

3. The learned counsel for the appellant assailed the impugned award on the ground that the said Tribunal has no jurisdiction to enforce a claim against the Railway administration in view of the provisions of section 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (old) and of section 168(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The learned counsel in support of his contention submitted that the Railway administration will be amenable to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in a case where both the Railway administration and the owner/driver of the offending vehicle are found to be jointly responsible. According to the learned counsel, the observation of the learned Tribunal recorded in para 8 of the impugned judgment while disposing of Issue No.3 that “the accident occurred clearly due to the negligence of NF Railway admi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top