SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 236

H.K.SEMA, P.C.PHUKAN
Nrithung Humtsoe – Appellant
Versus
Enibemo Ezung – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R.Murry , B.N.Sharma, Apok Pongener

H. K. Sema, J.—

This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 29.10.98 passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial) Wokha in Title Suit No.22 of 1997 whereby the learned Court below, had held that the suit was within time and the prayer of the defendant that the suit is barred by limitation has been rejected.

2. This appeal has been filed by the defendant No.6. It will be pertinent to mention herein that in Title Suit No.22 of 1997, the plaintiff impleaded as many as 6 (six) defendants. The defendant Nos 1 to 5 have not file any appeal against the judgment and order dated 29.1.93 impugned in this appeal, and therefore, the impugned order dated 29.10.98 in so far with regard to the defendant Nos 1 to 5 has become final.

3. We have heard Mr. BN Sarma, learned counsel for the appellant/defendant No.6 as well as Mr. KR Murry, learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs at length.

4. Basic facts may be noted. Plaintiff filed Title Suit No.22 of 1997 alleging that the plaintiffs are the actual land owners at 17 to 31 KMs Wokha to Bokajan Road in Pongiton village and properties were destroyed during the new formation of cutting of Wokha to Bokajan Road, bu


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top