SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 267

H.K.SEMA, P.C.PHUKAN
Ratan Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Das, D.Sarkar

P. C. Phukari, J-

This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment and

order dated 5.2.97 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, South Tripura at Udaipur convicting the accused appellant under sections 302/34, IPC and sentencing him there under to imprisonment for life in Sessions Case No. 44 (ST/S) of 1996.

2. We have considered the records of the case, perused the impugned

judgment and order, and heard Mr. D. Sarkar, learned counsel for the accused appellant and Mr. S. Das learned Public Prosecutor, State of Tripura.

3. On 30.1.95 at about 9 PM the Officer In-charge (PW 9) of Manubazar PS received information about an incident at Srinagar Bazar. He first went to Srinagar Primary Health Centre where he found the dead body of Pradip Ghose. He reached the place of occurrence at about 10.15 PM and received the FIR Ext 1 from the deceased's father Sudhir Ghose (PW 1 ). It is stated in the FIR that on 30.1 95 at about 6.30 PM the deceased came to Srinagar Bazar where his younger son Subrata (PW 8) saw that accused-appellant Ratan Debnath and other accused Santosh Debnath surrounded his brother Pradip, accused-appellant Ratan caught hold of him, accused Santosh struck him with dao and la















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top