P.G.AGARWAL
Hydar Ali – Appellant
Versus
Regia Begum – Respondent
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the respondent.
3. On 24.10.81 the respondent Mustt Regia Begum filed an application under section 125 CrPC claiming maintenance for herself and her minor children. As the petitioner husband did not contest the proceeding in spite of receipt of notice, the learned trial Court by order dated 13.1.82 directed the petitioner to pay the monthly maintenance of Rs. 200 to the applicant Regia Begum.
4. As per the order the amount of maintenance was deducted from the salary of the petitioner who is the Govt. servant and from 1982 to 1985 respondent was paid the maintenance, by deducting the amount from the salary. Since July 85 maintenance was not paid and on the prayer of the respondent warrant of arrest and fresh order of attachment of salary of the petitioner were issued and hence the present revision.
5. In this petition the petitioner has made certain statements regarding divorce etc which cannot be considered and decided in this revision. The petitio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.