J.N.SARMA
Satya Ranjan Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
2. At the time of argument Shri Saikia also argued that he also took up the point regarding the validity of the Notification issued on 2nd July, 1993. That contention is available at paragraph 42 of the writ application and that is quoted below :
"42. That the petitioner respectfully states that the delegation of power to impose penalty under section 44 (5) (b) of the Act to the Inspector of Taxes vide Notification No. CTS 3/92/15 dated 2nd July, 1993, issued by the respondent No. 2 in exercise of powers under section 3 (3) of the Act is ultra vires the provisions of Rule 10 of the Assam General Sales Tax Rules, 1993 inasmuch as Rule 10 expressly debars such delegation to any officer below the rank of a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.