SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 363

A.P.SINGH
A. R. Kothari – Appellant
Versus
Bharati Narzari – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.Jain, P.N.Chakraborty , B.B.Narzary, S.Chouhan

These two appeals are between the same parties and relate to the same matter raising same controversy between the parties, hence both the appeals are being decided together by a common judgment.

2. Second Appeal No. 10 of 1995 arises from Title Suit No. l3 of 1990. This suit was filed by the appellant. It was dismissed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 21.7.92 passed by Shri S K Saharia, Munsiff, Bongaigaon. Appellant filed appeal against me said judgment and decree of the Munsiff being Title Appeal No. 37 of 1993. The learned District Judge, Bongaigaon vide judgment and decree dated 5.8.94 dismissed the appeal. Thus giving rise to Appeal No.10 of 1995.

3. Second Appeal 9 of 1995 arises from Title Suit No.9 of 1993. This suit was filed by the respondent, Smti Bharati Narzary. The suit was decreed by the learned Munsiff Bongaigaon vide judgment and decree dated 21.7.92. Appellant filed appeal against the said decree-being Title Appeal No. 31 o£ 1993. The appeal was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Bongaigaon vide judgment and decree dated 5.8.94 dismissed the appeal. Thus giving arise to Appeal No. 10 of 1995.

4. In the two suits, one filed by the appellant and













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top