SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Gau) 386

N.SURJAMANI SINGH
Madhumallee Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Dutta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.Bhattacharjee , L.R.Das

The judgment and order dated 18th May, 1998 passed by the learned Additional Deputy Commissioner/District Judge at Shillong in Divorce Suit No. 3 (T) of 1996 is the subject matter under challenge in this appeal. The facts of the case in a short compass are as follows :

2. The appellant namely Smti Madhumallee Dutta as a plaintiff filed a petition under section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty by contending inter alia, that she was married to the respondent on 26th February, 1988 under Hindu customary rites and out of the said wedlock a son and a daughter were born on 9th January, 1989 and 8th March, 1993 respectively and, immediately after the marriage the petitioner-appellant could realise that the respondent suffers from sexual perversion as the respondent is a maniac whose sexual desire is unsatiable and very often the respondent used to come home with Video Cassette of Blue Film and view them after dinner and the appellant was forced by him to view those nauseating movies as the movies progressed the respondent would start violent love making with the petitioner- appellant in the line of disgusting action in the movie wh





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top